Variables significantly associated with higher condom use intentions towards a woman were lower ratings of her attractiveness, (p<0.0005), higher ratings of her STI likelihood, (p<0.0005) and lower estimates of the number of men who would have condomless sex with her, (p<0.0005). Demographic and sex experience variables that were significantly associated with participant's reporting higher condom use intentions were being either married or in an exclusive relationship (p=0.002), being less satisfied with sex life (p=0.016), lower age (p=0.001), higher number of sexual partners (p=0.001), higher age of first intercourse (p=0.003), lower lifetime rates of condomless sex (p<0.0005) but higher rates of condomless sex in the last 12 months (p<0.041) and lower confidence in their ability to determine, without asking, whether a woman had an STI (p=0.001). The participant's STI history was not significant.

Participant heterogeneity investigation

Thus they may not be appropriate reacting questions such as for instance as: carry out the condom have fun with intentions away from users that are far more drawn to help you women that it value because the within higher risk out-of a keen STI range from the ones from members that tantan attracted to ‘safe’ females? The second analyses target which insufficiency by offered contained in this-fellow member correlations ranging from evaluations (including, the new relationship anywhere between condom play with intentions and STI risk each participant).

Certain inside-participant correlations was extremely consistent, such as for example, the typical relationship ranging from participant’s attractiveness ratings in addition to their determination so you can make love feedback is , with forty-five members demonstrating a correlation >0.8. Yet not, in other areas, members have been alot more heterogeneous. In particular, because the average correlation between participant’s attractiveness evaluations in addition to their STI opportunities reviews was near to no, 21 professionals had strong choices getting possibly ‘safe’ otherwise ‘risky’ people, which have correlations either greater than 0.4 or less than ?0.4.

Brand new the amount that a person is actually interested in even more risky sexual people (internet explorer, new correlation ranging from participant’s appeal reviews as well as their STI probability analysis) had no impact on this new relationship ranging from their condom explore purposes feedback and their desire to own sex feedback. Men who have been attracted to high-risk people who had been keen on lowest-chance girls both got lower condom play with intentions to the girls which they was in fact attracted to (cf. the latest flat shipping out of points regarding straight down 50 % of profile 1A). Therefore, players so much more willing to make love that have safe people got lower condom explore aim towards safe females, whereas users even more prepared to have sex that have riskier people tended to own lower condom explore motives to your people high-exposure female (cf. the new diagonal shipping out of factors inside contour 1B, with exposure seekers towards the bottom right quadrant).

Scatterplots showing trends in the ratings of individual participants. Each point represents data from one participant: (A) the extent to which a participant tended to be attracted to women whom he judged to be likely to have a sexually transmitted infection (horizontal axis) had no influence on the extent to which he intended to use condoms with women he was willing to have sex with. (B) The extent to which a participant tended to be more willing to have sex with women whom he judged to be more likely to have asexually transmitted infection (horizontal axis) was significantly associated with his tendency to have lower condom use intentions towards those high-risk women (R 2 =0.3646, df=49, p<0.0001).

Conversation

This research implies that there can be a powerful correlation ranging from thought appeal and you can condom play with purposes during the heterosexual men. Participants have been even more happy to have sex which have attractive lady, however, have been less inclined to fool around with condoms when they do so. Agocha and you can Cooper13 discovered that male participants imagined people out-of large attractiveness just like the safer and you will stated that they were not as likely to go over risk-related subject areas together. Conceivably, such as for instance males you’ll accept that glamorous girls take care of themselves more than quicker attractive girls perform, and that they are stronger and you may pose less of a health exposure, legitimising their quicker condom fool around with motives. Yet not, which hypothesis was compromised of the Dijkstra ainsi que al’s finding12 one to professionals seen extremely glamorous women getting a whole lot more promiscuous and a lot more probably to own a keen STI than less attractive ladies. However, Epstein ainsi que al14 did not discover a serious effect of imagined elegance towards condomless gender intentions otherwise observed STI likelihood.