“I thus see your taking my personal and you may Gregg’s child to school today.” – however, I would recommend “our very own kid” and/or kid’s identity could be natural than simply “my personal and you can Gregg’s guy”?

When i agree with Warsaw Often, would it not nevertheless be grammatically correct to utilize “mine” in cases like this, if you think regarding “mine” as the referring to “my child”? Which is, imagine if the initial sentence try which?:

– Ok, but I think Gregg’s boy will happen first in that situation and also make clear just what “mine” is talking about:

In fact, it is far from specific regarding the modern whether or not we have been speaking in the two children. In case it is you to, and also the speaker nevertheless wants to discuss one another themself and you will Gregg, i quickly believe “Gregg’s and you can my personal man” would be natural than simply “My and you may Gregg’s boy”. And when there’s two – I’d prefer “Gregg’s and you can my family”, I think.

Hi porsche, I’m nevertheless not yes

– I am aware it isn’t what you requested, but the alot more I do believe about any of it, this new smaller need We select to mention sometimes Gregg or myself; each other understands whoever kid is involved. When we expose our very own child in order to some body Really don’t believe i constantly say, “It is Gregg’s and you may my girl”, however, sometimes “This is certainly our very own girl” otherwise “This really is my personal daughter”. Next, I believe we’d be much more planning to say “my personal kid” otherwise “my personal daughter” than “my guy”, wouldn’t we? Otherwise when i said before, only use its name:

For the analogy given in the new matter, my personal is correct and you may mine grammatically impossible – the others is simply design.

– I concur that that which you say ‘s the cure for the amazing matter, nevertheless the other individuals is not only on the layout, it is more about category of sheer. I simply don’t think you to definitely “my personal and you may Gregg’s kid” was absolute English. It generally does not sound to me instance anything a local speaker would state.

Will, I trust almost all you told you, except for some thing

Your asserted that the original phrase is not too clear. We disagree. All of the adaptation help with up until now provides a very specific definition:

can simply imply the same thing. A few would say this is ungrammatical, that have “my” coming earliest, but if perhaps not ungrammatical, it’s no less than experienced impolite of the every. So it pronoun shift is wholly unacceptable, even yet in relaxed address. If you chat such as this, group, “educated” or perhaps not, will consider you might be an earlier teen exactly who can not set out their portable.

may also simply suggest Greg keeps a kid, you have got another type of boy, and anyone got each other people to school. While this and additionally matical, it is still impolite. Comprehend the opinion significantly more than on “my”.

Mention, evey solitary one among these designs is completely unambiguous. Maybe are grammatical, however some will be eliminated for factors stated.

Last, Usually, your remark concerning need certainly to talk about Greg is extremely really taken. Particularly for cases where Greg along with a young child together with her, it would be not likely to refer Greg at all (making it also sharper you to definitely “mine” meaans a couple more infants). Very first, by discussing Greg, it is at the very least required that he is maybe not indeed present. If it is actually the situation, why would the guy be also said? You might just state

I completely agree totally that all of the phrases you have given is unambiguous, but they might be every result of the translation of the completely new phrase. Ok, due to the fact sbee after that requires in the event it can be ‘my’, the guy really does make it clear, but if i use the completely new sentence because stands instead you to opinion, however however think it is uncertain. We thinkl that is what I created.